The big question in the physics community around the country: Should the federal government sponsor the theory of gravitineferous aether? In case you don't know, this theory is a quantization of general relativity whose popularity has skyrocketed over the last couple years.
But what's all the hype about? Well for starters, just by existing, it has to be more testable then the monster string theory has developed into. In my professional opinion, supersymmetry has just escalated into no more than an overly intricate mathematical model. And magnetic monopoles? Really? What happened to the resilience of Feynman's quantum electrodynamics? If QED must be scrapped, then the whole Standard Model might as well be negated.
Well, that's all beside the point, especially now that we have gravitineferous aether. This theory's most prevalent success was in the reimplication of general relativity. This theory managed to solve the CERN neutrino anomaly that came up back in September. It also, unlike supersymmetry (see, I was going somewhere!), gravitineferous aether actually provides multiple TESTABLE scenarios agreeing with QED. And the model, like its precursor, was developed intuitively with time-energy thought experiments. It's like Einstein all over again.
Once I get a bit more time, I'll be sure to explain the underlying concepts for those just with a basic interest, then I'll go into depth on the mathematics that model gravitineferous aether. Thanks for reading, and support the government's decision to back this theory.
